Photo: NOFIMA
The status for fillet colour in Norwegian farmed salmon
NORWAY
Monday, August 12, 2024, 06:00 (GMT + 9)
Nofima has mapped the status of and what could pose pigmentation challenges in salmon fillets among Norwegian fish farmers. According to Nofima scientists, the mapping also provides insights into some solutions that can be pursued further.
The investigation reveals the negative effect that repeated mechanical delousing has on fillet colour. This effect has not been documented before and could be caused by several factors. It may be due to increased breakdown of an antioxidant like astaxanthin when the fish are stressed. However, it could also be that reduced feed intake results in lower slaughter weight, which is of great importance in relation to fillet colour. If fish are slaughtered at a lower weight to avoid more delousing, this will have a further negative effect on colour.
The findings are based on questionnaires answered by Norwegian industry actors in 2023, data on fillet colour from commercial productions between 2012 and 2023, and from Nofima’s R&D licenses. FHF – Norwegian Seafood Research Fund has funded the study, which has been carried out by Nofima senior scientist Trine Ytrestøyl and her colleagues.
“There is a high degree of correlation between what the fish farmers report in the questionnaire and what we observe affecting pigmentation in the data analysis, so there is reason to believe it provides a realistic picture of the situation,” says Ytrestøyl.
Variable scope of problems
Not all fish farmers perceive inadequate fillet colour as a problem. Some report a reduction in pigmentation in 2 percent of slaughtered fish, while others indicate problems with 20-40 percent of the slaughtered fish.
There is also variation in their target for the lowest acceptable colour, ranging from 24 to 27 on the SalmoFan scale and between 5 and 7 milligrams of astaxanthin per kilogram of fillet.
Historical data show that the colour intensity of Norwegian salmon has decreased somewhat from 2012 to 2021, with a slight increase after this period. There is also more variation in fillet colour now than in the past, which supports the results of the questionnaire: some fish farmers struggle more with pigmentation than others.
Not all fish farmers have the same standard for minimum colour intensity. Some believe it should be at least 24 on the SalmoFan scale, while others believe it should be 27. Photo: Terje Aamodt, Nofima.
Measures require planning and minimal lice
Almost all respondents had taken measures to improve pigmentation. There is more astaxanthin in the feed (50-70 mg per kg) than before and some fish farmers also have more of the omega-3 fatty acids EPA and DHA as well as vitamins in the feed.
“This has had a positive effect, but it is expensive, and we have tried to find out what leads to inadequate pigmentation,” says Trine Ytrestøyl.
Astaxanthin concentration in farmed salmon from 2012 to 2023 shown as a plot of proportion of salmon with a given concentration of astaxanthin. The year indicates the time of slaughter.
There are seasonal variations in pigmentation, and this can be taken into account when planning production. Very rapid growth resulted in poorer pigmentation, while the colour increased with greater slaughter weight. There was also a clear negative effect from many mechanical delousing treatments.
“This has not been shown before, although it has been mentioned as a possible cause of poor fillet colour.”
Year and girth weight plotted against modeled effect on astaxanthin content in fillet. The model is a mixed additive model. Note that no interaction between round weight and year is included in the model.
What surprised the scientists was the significant difference in colour at slaughter between suppliers of hatchery fish. They want to investigate this further to determine what impact the hatchery phase has on pigmentation levels when the fish are slaughtered.
The mapping includes a range of data that is useful for fish farmers to examine more closely. The full report can be found on the FHF project website.
Source: NOFIMA
editorial@seafood.media
www.seafood.media
|